Applying learning roadmaps across universities showed junior students lack readiness for self-educational activity in blended learning, while senior students embrace blended learning principles yet prefer traditional forms¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Junior students have almost no readiness for self-educational academic activity in conditions of blended learning. → Andreeva et al. 2018
q1 i? Senior students are eager to embrace blended learning principles yet nevertheless prefer traditional forms and methods of learning. → Andreeva et al. 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
Andreeva et al. 2018¶
Nadezhda M. Andreeva, Ivan P. Artyukhov, Elena G. Myagkova, Nikolay I. Pak, Zhamilya K. Akkasynova. (2018). Organizing Blended Learning for Students on the Basis of Learning Roadmaps. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(2), 47-64. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1181973
q1 · i? · design · r2
This is the authors' concluding generalisation from their experience of applying learning roadmaps with students of different universities (SFU, KrasSMU, KSPU, KazNPU); it is stated as an experience-based conclusion, not a tested comparison, and no effect size or test statistic is printed for it.
"Junior students have almost no readiness for self-educational academic activity in conditions of blended learning;"
Andreeva et al. 2018 (2)¶
Nadezhda M. Andreeva, Ivan P. Artyukhov, Elena G. Myagkova, Nikolay I. Pak, Zhamilya K. Akkasynova. (2018). Organizing Blended Learning for Students on the Basis of Learning Roadmaps. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(2), 47-64. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1181973
q1 · i? · causal · r1
A second experience-based conclusion from the same multi-university application: senior students in the history of computer science course were allowed to select the form of classes convenient for them, and the authors conclude they embraced blended learning principles while preferring traditional forms. No measure or statistic is printed.
"Senior students are eager to embrace the principles of blended learning, yet they nevertheless prefer the traditional forms and methods of learning;"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- SDL and SRL are developmental processes: senior students show more self-directed and self-regulated learning across several reviewed studies — related
- In the projective-recursive history of computer science course, 90% of senior students overcame the 100-point credit limit two weeks before the deadline, though only 5% initially planned the credit-securing website route — related
- The roadmap-based blended learning methodological system is associated with statistically valid improvement in diagnostic-group results from the beginning to the end of the experiment, while control-group change was random — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.