Claims

KANO questionnaire results show students' growth within a lesson was the highest-priority metacognitive indicator, while 15 of 17 indicators were categorized as Indifferent

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the KANO questionnaire with 45 primary school teachers, students' growth within a lesson received the highest teacher satisfaction (TS 0.70, DS -0.37), and goal achievement was also categorized as One-dimensional or Attractive. → Susan Verbunt-Janssen 2026

Evidence

Susan Verbunt-Janssen 2026

Susan Verbunt-Janssen, Carolien A. N. Knoop-van Campen, Martine Baars, Inge Molenaar. (2026). Teacher dashboard design for self-regulated learning: a participatory approach. Educational technology research and development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10632-z

q2 · i? · design · r2

KANO questionnaire analysis of 45 Dutch primary school teachers with ALT experience; the article reports "15 out of 17" metacognitive items were categorized as Indifferent, with students' goal achievement and growth within a lesson categorized as One-dimensional or Attractive.

"The highest satisfaction rate was assigned to 'students' growth within a lesson' (TS 0.70, DS -0.37), positioning this as the most significant metacognitive indicator for teachers."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id kano-growth-within-lesson-top-metacognitive-indicator
title KANO questionnaire results show students' growth within a lesson was the highest-priority metacognitive indicator, while 15 of 17 indicators were categorized as Indifferent
description KANO questionnaire results show students' growth within a lesson was the highest-priority metacognitive indicator, while 15 of 17 indicators were categorized as Indifferent
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — susan-verbunt-janssen-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.