Claims

Attrition patterns at KIPP middle schools are typically no different than at nearby schools

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Student attrition at KIPP middle schools is typically no different from attrition at nearby comparison schools. → Ira Nichols-Barrer 2016

Evidence

Ira Nichols-Barrer 2016

Ira Nichols-Barrer, Philip Gleason, Brian Gill, Christina Clark Tuttle. (2016). Student Selection, Attrition, and Replacement in KIPP Middle Schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(1). https://www.mathematica.org/publications/student-selection-attrition-and-replacement-in-kipp-middle-schools

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Comparative analysis of attrition patterns across 19 KIPP middle schools versus nearby schools. The study reports that "attrition patterns are typically no different at KIPP than at nearby schools." No effect size is printed.

"attrition patterns are typically no different at KIPP than at nearby schools"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id kipp-attrition-no-different-than-nearby-schools
title Attrition patterns at KIPP middle schools are typically no different than at nearby schools
description Attrition patterns at KIPP middle schools are typically no different than at nearby schools
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ira-nichols-barrer-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.