Claims

All conditions achieved significant knowledge gains with no condition, gender, or interaction effects

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Knowledge scores rose significantly from pre-test to post-test (F(1,55) = 60.23, p = 0.00, d = 1.10), with no main effect of condition or gender and no interaction effect. → Hans van der Meij 2015

Evidence

Hans van der Meij 2015

Hans van der Meij, Jan van der Meij, Ruth Harmsen. (2015). Animated pedagogical agents effects on enhancing student motivation and learning in a science inquiry learning environment. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9378-5

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Pre-test/post-test with 27 multiple-choice items in the 61-student experiment; the article reports a significant time effect at d = 1.10 and no condition, gender, or interaction effects. Table 4 prints gains for all conditions (e.g., control boys 5.10, agent girls 3.55).

"An ANOVA with condition and gender as fixed factors and the test scores as dependent variable showed a significant effect over time, F(1,55) = 60.23, p = 0.00, d = 1.10. There was no main effect of condition or gender, and there was also no interaction effect. In all conditions, boys and girls made significant progress."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.