Claims

Knowledge-sharing discourse was the most common mode in KF discussions, while knowledge-building discourse was comparatively rare

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across 69 narrative units, knowledge-sharing discourse occurred 46 times, knowledge-construction discourse 12 times, and knowledge-building discourse five times. → Fu 2016

Evidence

Fu 2016

Fu, E. L. F., van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2016). Toward a classification of discourse patterns in asynchronous online discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 441-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9245-3

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Narrative analysis of 69 units of analysis drawn from three KF discussion views (Grade 5 Science, Grade 10 Visual Arts, Grade 10 Liberal Studies) identified nine discourse patterns. The authors report that BKnowledge-sharing discourse was the most common, occurring 46 times, with knowledge construction at 12 and knowledge building at five occurrences.

"Knowledge-sharing discourse was the most common, occurring 46 times. Knowledge-construction discourse occurred 12 times, and knowledge-building discourse five, indicating that knowledge sharing was pervasive in KF discussions, while knowledge building was comparatively rare."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id knowledge-sharing-most-common-knowledge-building-rare
title Knowledge-sharing discourse was the most common mode in KF discussions, while knowledge-building discourse was comparatively rare
description Knowledge-sharing discourse was the most common mode in KF discussions, while knowledge-building discourse was comparatively rare
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — fu-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.