The Korean meta-analysis's overall effect (.80) differs from Flower et al.'s (2007) near-zero finding, attributed to age, combined formats, and longer duration¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The overall effect size of .80 in this replication differs from the .04 reported by Flower et al. (2007), and the author attributes the difference to participant age, use of combined formats, and longer simulation durations. → Mookyung Jeon 2018

Evidence¶

Mookyung Jeon 2018¶

Mookyung Jeon. (2018). Meta-Analysis of Disability Simulation Research for Elementary Students in Korea. International Journal of Special Education, 33(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1184078

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

The abstract of this replication meta-analysis states the overall effect size is .80, "different from the results of previous meta -analytic research (= .04)" reported by Flower et al. (2007). The discussion attributes the difference to age, formats, and duration; these are the author's interpretations, not tested contrasts.

"Results show that the overall effect size is .80 which is different from the results of previous meta -analytic research (= .04). This research discusses the difference in results and provides p ractical advice that complements identified shortcomings of disability simulations."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Disability simulation shows a medium-to-large overall effect on elementary students' perception, attitudes, and behaviors in Korean studies (weighted d = .80) — related
• No negative effects of disability simulation are found among elementary students in the Korean studies — related
• Guided ASR practice improves overall pronunciation accuracy of Korean EFL learners more than ordinary classroom pronunciation practice alone — related
• Amount of ASR practice (days per week, session length) showed no observable difference in pronunciation improvement — related