Strategic use of MLs' L1 during decoding instruction was effective: shared letter-sound correspondences did not have to be retaught, and Spanish CVC segmentation instruction increased English decoding¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Reviews found MLs' L1 was used effectively during decoding instruction: some English letter-sound correspondences did not have to be retaught when students' L1 shared the same correspondences, and explicit instruction in segmenting Spanish CVC words followed by letter-sound instruction increased MLs' English decoding. → Kittle 2024
Evidence¶
Kittle 2024¶
Kittle, J. M., Amendum, S. J., & Budde, C. M. (2024). What Does Research Say About the Science of Reading for K-5 Multilingual Learners? A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09942-6
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Synthesis of RQ2 findings on L1 use during English decoding instruction, drawing on August & Shanahan (2010) and Shanahan & Beck (2006) as reported in this review of reviews. The review reports cross-linguistic sharing of letter-sound correspondences and Spanish CVC segmentation instruction improving English decoding. No effect size is printed.
"Specifically, some English letter-sound correspondences did not have to be retaught when students’ L1 shared the same correspondences (August & Shanahan, 2010). Explicit instruction in how to segment Spanish CVC words followed by letter-sound relationship instruction increased MLs’ English decoding (Shanahan & Beck, 2006)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Decoding — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Promoting minority children's L1 raises L1 achievement at no cost to L2 achievement — related
- L1 decoding is positively related to English reading comprehension for Spanish- and Chinese-speaking MLs, with the correlation decreasing as children get older — related
- In Spanish, decoding accuracy is typically established earlier, after which rate becomes a more sensitive predictor of passage comprehension — related
- Phoneme awareness is a stronger predictor of reading development than rhyme awareness — related
- English (L2) decoding shows a strong linear relationship with English reading comprehension, with the correlation decreasing as children get older — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
l1-use-in-decoding-instruction-effective |
title |
Strategic use of MLs' L1 during decoding instruction was effective: shared letter-sound correspondences did not have to be retaught, and Spanish CVC segmentation instruction increased English decoding |
description |
Strategic use of MLs' L1 during decoding instruction was effective: shared letter-sound correspondences did not have to be retaught, and Spanish CVC segmentation instruction increased English decoding |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kittle-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.