Claims

Strategic use of MLs' L1 during decoding instruction was effective: shared letter-sound correspondences did not have to be retaught, and Spanish CVC segmentation instruction increased English decoding

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Reviews found MLs' L1 was used effectively during decoding instruction: some English letter-sound correspondences did not have to be retaught when students' L1 shared the same correspondences, and explicit instruction in segmenting Spanish CVC words followed by letter-sound instruction increased MLs' English decoding. → Kittle 2024

Evidence

Kittle 2024

Kittle, J. M., Amendum, S. J., & Budde, C. M. (2024). What Does Research Say About the Science of Reading for K-5 Multilingual Learners? A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09942-6

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Synthesis of RQ2 findings on L1 use during English decoding instruction, drawing on August & Shanahan (2010) and Shanahan & Beck (2006) as reported in this review of reviews. The review reports cross-linguistic sharing of letter-sound correspondences and Spanish CVC segmentation instruction improving English decoding. No effect size is printed.

"Specifically, some English letter-sound correspondences did not have to be retaught when students’ L1 shared the same correspondences (August & Shanahan, 2010). Explicit instruction in how to segment Spanish CVC words followed by letter-sound relationship instruction increased MLs’ English decoding (Shanahan & Beck, 2006)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id l1-use-in-decoding-instruction-effective
title Strategic use of MLs' L1 during decoding instruction was effective: shared letter-sound correspondences did not have to be retaught, and Spanish CVC segmentation instruction increased English decoding
description Strategic use of MLs' L1 during decoding instruction was effective: shared letter-sound correspondences did not have to be retaught, and Spanish CVC segmentation instruction increased English decoding
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kittle-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.