Claims

L2 proficiency level significantly influences Iranian EFL learners' overall appropriateness of apology speech act production

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Advanced experimental learners significantly outperformed intermediate experimental learners at both pre-test and post-test. → Rajabi et al. 2015

Evidence

Rajabi et al. 2015

Shima Rajabi, Akbar Azizifar, & Habib Gowhary. (2015). Investigating the of Explicit Instruction of Apology Speech Act on Pragmatic Development of Iranian EFL Learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.4p.53

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-samples t-tests comparing the two experimental groups across proficiency levels (pre-test t=3.027, p=.025; post-test t=1.71, p=.047). The article states "the amount of mean differences were positive", with advanced participants performing better at both time points.

"Table 8 shows that there is significant difference between both intermediate and advanced experimental groups in pretest and post test results. Also, the amount of mean differences were positive"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.