Claims

L2 reading strategy instruction raised self-reported Persian (L1) reading strategy awareness and use

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group gained significantly more than the control group on the Persian reading strategies questionnaire, indicating transfer of strategy awareness and use to L1. → Talebi 2012

Evidence

Talebi 2012

Seyed Hassan Talebi. (2012). Reading in L2 (English) and L1 (Persian): An Investigation into Reveres Transfer of Reading Strategies. English Language Teaching, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n3p217

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Repeated measure ANOVA on the Persian version of the reading strategies questionnaire (Table 6); Change x Group was highly significant (F=3418.346; P<.000), with the experimental group gaining 30.34 scores versus 1.83 for controls.

"From the table we find that the experimental group had a gain of 30.34 scores (from 46.38 to 76.72) whereas the control group had a gain of only 1.83 scores (from 47.20 to 49.03)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.