Claims

A learning analytics student model discriminates between trained and untrained students in VR lineworker training maneuvers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2023: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A student model built with several classifiers discriminates between trained and untrained students in different maneuvers using three minimum evaluation proficiency scores. → Santamaría Bonfil 2020

Evidence

Santamaría Bonfil 2020

Santamaría Bonfil, G., Ibáñez Espiga, M. B., Pérez Ramírez, M., Arroyo Figueroa, G., & Martínez Álvarez, F. (2020). Learning analytics for student modeling in virtual reality training systems: Lineworkers case. Computers & Education, 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103871

q2 · i? · associational · r1

The abstract reports that a student model built from trace data of 1399 students in 329 VRTS courses can "discriminate between trained and untrained students", with Random Forest standing out among several classifiers tested.

"The results show that the model can discriminate between trained and untrained students, the Random Forest algorithm standing out."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.