The three laboratory-devised production tests (Economic Prophecies, Sheet Music Invention, Novel Situations) tied in average merit among the most effective tests.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 1916 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Economic Prophecies, the Invention for Sheet Music, and Novel Situations tied in average merit and were among the most effective tests. → Chassell 1916
Evidence¶
Chassell 1916¶
Chassell, L. M. (1916). Tests for originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(6), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070310
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Interpretation of ranking results from the 100-student trial: the three tests requiring generative responses, devised in the authors' laboratory, "tie in average merit and are among the most effective tests." Novel Situations ranked second in correlation with final group rank.
"to note that the three tie in average merit and are among the most effective tests. This result is gratifying, since they were among those devised in our laboratory."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A three-test subset (Analogues, Chain Puzzle, Economic Prophecies) differentiated the group nearly as well as the full twelve-test battery. — related
- Invention Tasks Prepare Future Learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
laboratory-devised-tests-tie-in-merit |
title |
The three laboratory-devised production tests (Economic Prophecies, Sheet Music Invention, Novel Situations) tied in average merit among the most effective tests. |
description |
The three laboratory-devised production tests (Economic Prophecies, Sheet Music Invention, Novel Situations) tied in average merit among the most effective tests. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
1916 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — chassell-1916 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.