Claims

No posttest difference between experiment and control groups on the MPERS Labyrinth sub-scale

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The Labyrinth sub-scale was the one Application Form measure on which experiment and control groups did not differ significantly at posttest. → Polat and Sönmez 2015

Evidence

Polat and Sönmez 2015

Özgül Polat, Ayşegül Sönmez. (2015). The Effect of Play Supported Program on the School Readiness of 60-72 Month-Old Disadvantaged Children. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1067712

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Posttest between-group Mann-Whitney U comparison of the Labyrinth sub-scale (2 questions) in the same 40-child pretest-posttest control group study. The article reports no statistically significant difference; equivalence was not tested and no effect size is printed.

"Contrary to these findings, no statistically significant difference was found between MPERS Labyrinth sub-scale scores of children in experiment and control groups (U=150,000 – p>0,05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.