No posttest difference between experiment and control groups on the MPERS Labyrinth sub-scale¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The Labyrinth sub-scale was the one Application Form measure on which experiment and control groups did not differ significantly at posttest. → Polat and Sönmez 2015
Evidence¶
Polat and Sönmez 2015¶
Özgül Polat, Ayşegül Sönmez. (2015). The Effect of Play Supported Program on the School Readiness of 60-72 Month-Old Disadvantaged Children. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1067712
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Posttest between-group Mann-Whitney U comparison of the Labyrinth sub-scale (2 questions) in the same 40-child pretest-posttest control group study. The article reports no statistically significant difference; equivalence was not tested and no effect size is printed.
"Contrary to these findings, no statistically significant difference was found between MPERS Labyrinth sub-scale scores of children in experiment and control groups (U=150,000 – p>0,05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.