Claims

Language, in addition to processing speed and attentive behavior, significantly predicts fraction calculations in at-risk fourth graders

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? For fraction calculations, significant predictors were language, processing speed, and attentive behavior, with the model accounting for 32% of variance. → Namkung 2016

Evidence

Namkung 2016

Namkung, J. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2016). Cognitive Predictors of Calculations and Number Line Estimation with Whole Numbers and Fractions among At-Risk Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000055

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Same structural equation model as the whole-number outcome: latent fraction calculations (Fraction Addition and Fraction Subtraction) predicted from seven cognitive predictors and incoming calculation skill in 139 at-risk fourth graders. The model "accounted for 51% and 32% of the variance" in whole-number and fraction calculations respectively; language emerged as a significant predictor only for the fraction outcome.

"For fraction calculations, significant predictors were language, processing speed, and attentive behavior."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.