Early implanted children and their NH age-matched peers demonstrated word learning, while late implanted children did not unlike their peers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Paired t-tests showed significant target preferences for the early implanted group (Cohen's d = 1.41), their NH peers (d = .68), and the late group's NH peers (d = 1.17), but not for the late implanted group. → Derek M. Houston 2012
Evidence¶
Derek M. Houston 2012¶
Derek M. Houston, Jessica Stewart, Aaron Moberly, George Hollich, and Richard T. Miyamoto. (2012). Word learning in deaf children with cochlear implants: effects of early auditory experience. Dev Sci. 2012 May ; 15(3): 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01140.x
q3 · i3 · associational · r1
Paired t-tests on mean looking time differences for early implanted, late implanted, and their NH age-matched groups. The early implanted group showed d = 1.41; the late implanted group did not differ from chance (t(7) < 1).
"Paired t-tests revealed that the mean looking time differences between the target and nontarget was statistically significant for the early implanted group (t(11) = 4.85, p = .001, Cohen's d = 1.41), their normal-hearing peers (t(11) = 2.32, p = .04, Cohen's d = .68), and the normal-hearing peers of the late implanted group (t(7) = 3.14, Cohen's d = 1.17), but not for the late implanted group (t(7) < 1)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Early implanted children performed significantly better on the word-learning task than late implanted children — related
- Normal-hearing children demonstrate novel word learning on the IPLP task at approximately 18 months of age and older — related
- Age at implantation accounts for significant variance in word-learning performance when pre-CI hearing is in the typical range for CI candidates — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
late-implanted-fail-word-learning |
title |
Early implanted children and their NH age-matched peers demonstrated word learning, while late implanted children did not unlike their peers |
description |
Early implanted children and their NH age-matched peers demonstrated word learning, while late implanted children did not unlike their peers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — derek-m-houston-2012 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.