Claims

Evaluation of layperson videos is predicted by self-efficacy, personal justification, respect for others' viewpoint, and negatively by age

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Multiple regression predicts layperson-video evaluation from self-efficacy, personal justification beliefs, respect for others' viewpoint, and age (negative). → Brivael Hémon 2025

Evidence

Brivael Hémon 2025

Brivael Hémon, Kevin de Checchi, Amaël Arguel, Bastien Trémolière, & Franck Amadieu. (2025). Relationships Between Critical Thinking Dispositions and Evaluation of Videos with Variation in the Level of Expertise of the Source Among Middle and High School Students. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105274

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Second multiple regression (Results §4.2) on layperson-video trustworthiness evaluation; the printed coefficients include "respect for others' viewpoint (β = .23, p < .001), and age (β = -.15, p = .007)". No standardised effect size is printed for this finding.

"This measure was predicted by video evaluation self-efficacy (β = .17, p = .002), the tendency to justify one's evaluation of video by personal knowledge or beliefs (β = .16, p = .006), the respect for others' viewpoint (β = .23, p < .001), and age (β = -.15, p = .007)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id layperson-video-evaluation-disposition-predictors
title Evaluation of layperson videos is predicted by self-efficacy, personal justification, respect for others' viewpoint, and negatively by age
description Evaluation of layperson videos is predicted by self-efficacy, personal justification, respect for others' viewpoint, and negatively by age
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — brivael-hémon-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.