Claims

LCFF-induced spending increases reduced suspensions and expulsions, with larger effects for boys and the most pronounced effects for Black students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A $1,000 per-pupil spending increase over 3 consecutive years reduced the likelihood of suspension or expulsion in a high school year by 5–6 percentage points for boys and 3 points for girls. → Johnson 2023 q2 i? For Black students, the same $1,000 increase (grades 8–10) reduced the likelihood of suspension or expulsion in 10th grade by 8 percentage points for Black boys and 5 points for Black girls. → Johnson 2023 (2)

Evidence

Johnson 2023

Johnson, R. C. (2023). School funding effectiveness: Evidence from California's Local Control Funding Formula. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/529.194

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental analysis of disciplinary incidents across grades 3–10, using LCFF-induced spending variation. Effects were greater for boys than girls and larger in high school than elementary and middle school.

"a $1,000 increase in per-pupil spending experienced for 3 consecutive years was associated with a 5 to 6 percentage-point reduction in the likelihood of being suspended or expelled in a given year of high school for boys and a 3 percentage-point reduction for girls."

Johnson 2023 (2)

Johnson, R. C. (2023). School funding effectiveness: Evidence from California's Local Control Funding Formula. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/529.194

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Subgroup analysis of the same disciplinary outcome for Black students, the group the article identifies as having the most pronounced impacts. No standardised effect size is printed for these estimates.

"a $1,000 increase in per-pupil spending experienced for 3 consecutive years (grades 8–10) was associated with an 8 percentage-point reduction in the likelihood of suspension or expulsion in high school (10th grade) among Black boys and a 5 percentage-point reduction in the probability of suspension or expulsion for Black girls."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id lcff-spending-reduces-suspension-expulsion-disparities
title LCFF-induced spending increases reduced suspensions and expulsions, with larger effects for boys and the most pronounced effects for Black students
description LCFF-induced spending increases reduced suspensions and expulsions, with larger effects for boys and the most pronounced effects for Black students
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — johnson-2023, johnson-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.