In case examples, leaders and team members showed markedly different average peaks-per-segment EDA values during the same simulation segments¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Descriptive case examples from individual simulations show leaders and team members experiencing different APPS values in the same segment. → Moreno 2024

Evidence¶

Moreno 2024¶

Moreno, M., Patino Melo, L., Grewal, K., Matin, N., Azher, S., & Harley, J.M. (2024). Analyzing Multimodal Data to Understand Medical Trainees' Regulation Strategies and Physiological Responses in High-Fidelity Medical Simulation Scenarios. Metacognition and Learning, 19, 1161–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09403-z

q1 · i? · associational · r1

Descriptive case example from the third simulation (V3) reported in the Results narrative; other examples print 3.5 vs 2.92 APPS (V4) and 4.5 vs 4.0 APPS (V7). These are descriptive values with no statistical test reported.

"the leader experienced 3.89 APPS (APPS[average peaks per segment] was our unit of analysis for EDA) while their team member experienced a lower 0.25 APPS during the same segment, highlighting the differences in their EDA response."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Segmentation boundary choices differentially affect statistics computed on epistemic-game process data — related
• Patterns of SRL and SSRL behaviors among medical trainees predict electrodermal activity at distinct stages of high-fidelity simulation training — related
• In the beginning-segment Lasso model, participant role accounted for 15% of the final prediction model — related
• In medical simulation training, socially shared regulation relates to subsequent emotional stabilization, with electrodermal activity modeled as a dependent variable — related
• Lecture-based learning events show a clearer decline in EDA across within-event segments than flipped learning events — related