High pupil learning gains were not related to a high extent of teacher technology integration; junior classes gained more than senior class 2b¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 Across the four PictoPal classes, learning gains differed by class, F(3, 86) = 2.946, p < .05, with junior classes 1a and 1b gaining more than senior class 2b, and high gains could not be related to high integration. → Amina Cviko 2012
Evidence¶
Amina Cviko 2012¶
Amina Cviko, Susan McKenney, Joke Voogt. (2012). Teachers enacting a technology-rich curriculum for emergent literacy. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9208-3
q2 · i2 · causal · r1
Cross-case ANCOVA of the four PictoPal classes with national language test as covariate. The learning gains of 1a (M = 3.81) and 1b (M = 3.72) were higher than 2b (M = 2.09); Table 7 prints Cohen's d from 1.02 to 1.76.
"An ANCOVA with pre-post differences as dependent variable, class (1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b) as an independent variable, and scores on the national language test as a covariate showed a difference for class F (3, 86) = 2,946, p< .05, g2 = .09."
Amina Cviko 2012 (2)¶
Amina Cviko, Susan McKenney, Joke Voogt. (2012). Teachers enacting a technology-rich curriculum for emergent literacy. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9208-3
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Cross-case comparison of integration and engagement data with learning outcomes. The authors state high learning gains "cannot be related to the high extent of technology integration", and offer a ceiling effect as an explanation.
"Findings also indicate that the high pupil learning gains cannot be related to the high extent of technology integration of on- and off-computer activities."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Time working within PictoPal explained significant variance in teacher integration and pupil engagement across the eight-week implementation — related
- Senior kindergarteners engaged to a higher extent in on-computer activities than junior kindergarteners — related
- Senior kindergarten teachers integrated on- and off-computer activities to a significantly higher extent than junior kindergarten teachers — related
- Kindergarteners using PictoPal showed significantly higher emergent literacy learning gains than control-group pupils — related
- A developmental teaching approach, positive technology attitudes and expectations, and perceived principal support related to a high extent of technology integration — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
learning-gains-not-related-to-integration-extent |
title |
High pupil learning gains were not related to a high extent of teacher technology integration; junior classes gained more than senior class 2b |
description |
High pupil learning gains were not related to a high extent of teacher technology integration; junior classes gained more than senior class 2b |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — amina-cviko-2012, amina-cviko-2012-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.