Claims

Instruction tailored to students' learning styles shows a large pooled random-effects effect on academic achievement (d = 1.029) across 29 Turkish experimental studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 The random-effects common effect size of learning-styles-tailored instruction on academic achievement is d = 1.029, a large effect. → Kanadlı 2016

Evidence

Kanadlı 2016

Kanadlı, S. (2016). A meta-analysis on the effect of instructional designs based on the learning styles models on academic achievement, attitude and retention. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 2057–2086. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.6.0084

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 29 experimental studies from Turkey (2004–2014) with a total sample of 2159 students; heterogeneity was high (I² = 75.21%), so the random effect model was used. The pooled d = 1.029 corresponds to a U3 of 84.1%, meaning "the average student receiving instruction tailored to their learning styles (treatment group) scored higher on achievement tests than 84.1% of students receiving no instruction".

"When the effect sizes of 29 studies included in this review were combined according to the random effect model, the common effect size was calculated as (d) 1.029 with 0.095 standard error, and 95% confidence intervals of 1.216 and 0.843."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.