Research on value education in India reports that lecturing on values does not transact values effectively to children¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 3 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Research studies in the field of value education report that lecturing on values by teachers or resource persons does not transact values effectively to children, and that students and teachers need new methods of value acquisition and transaction. → Sankaranarayanan Paleeri 2014

Evidence¶

Sankaranarayanan Paleeri 2014¶

Sankaranarayanan Paleeri. (2014). Setting Objectives of Value Education in Constructivist Approach in the Light of Revised Blooms Taxonomy (RBT). i-manager's Journal of School Educational Technology. https://www.imanagerpublications.com

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

The article's conclusion reports, citing Goel & Goel (2005), findings of research studies in value education: the education system is not congenial to value promotion, teachers lack knowledge and rationality of values, and "Lecturing on values by teachers or any other resource persons does not transact values effectively to children." No study designs or statistics are printed.

"Lecturing on values by teachers or any other resource persons does not transact values effectively to children."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Discussion promotes more active thinking than lecture, though lecture is no worse for transmitting information — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
• Community projects need conceptual framing to avoid narrowing the learning object — related
• Parent Coaching Outperforms Information Only — related