Claims

Teachers valued Lesson Study as professional development and reported changes to their practice despite null pupil outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitative r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teachers felt Lesson Study was useful professional development, valued structured collaboration with colleagues, and reported practice changes. → Murphy et al. 2017 q2 i? Some teachers reported improvements in case pupils' skills such as vocabulary, reading comprehension, and metacognition, but case pupils were not tracked individually. → Murphy et al. 2017 (2)

Evidence

Murphy et al. 2017

Richard Murphy, Felix Weinhardt, Gill Wyness and Heather Rolfe. (2017). Lesson Study: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581145

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Process evaluation based on observation of training, surveys, school visits to ten schools with 19 staff interviewed, and follow-up interviews, analysed using a framework approach. Teachers "valued the opportunity to collaborate with colleagues in a structured way".

"Teachers felt Lesson Study was useful professional development, valued the opportunity to collaborate with colleagues in a structured way, and reported several changes to their practice as a result of the programme."

Murphy et al. 2017 (2)

Richard Murphy, Felix Weinhardt, Gill Wyness and Heather Rolfe. (2017). Lesson Study: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581145

q2 · i? · qualitative · r1

Self-reported teacher accounts from the process evaluation. The report notes case pupils were not tracked individually, so there is no information about whether these pupils benefitted.

"Some teachers said they had changed their practice in relation to case pupils and reported improvements in these pupils ’ skills, for example in vocabulary, reading comprehension, and metacognition."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.