Claims

The informal letter-writing assignment significantly improved scores on a midterm exam containing both multiple-choice and essay components

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Students in the writing condition scored significantly higher than controls on the multiple-choice plus essay midterm (partial η² = .14). → Bersamin 2013

Evidence

Bersamin 2013

Bersamin, M., Zamboanga, B.L. & Orsak-Neff, N. (2013). Understanding course content through letter writing: Do informal writing assignments improve grades? Psychology Teaching Review, 19(1). https://www.bps.org.uk/journal/psychology-teaching-review

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

ANCOVA on post-test 2 (multiple-choice and essay midterm) in the counterbalanced experiment, controlling for pre-test scores; Table 3 reports experimental group F=5.89, partial η²=.14, p=.02. The writing group's adjusted mean was "significantly higher" than controls, an eight-point difference.

"respondents in the writing condition scored significantly higher (adjusted means: M =80.03, SE=2.03) than those in the control group (adjusted means: M=72.71, SE=2.09)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.