Only letter naming among rapid-naming measures showed significant correlation with reading and writing¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In respect of rapid naming, only letters naming showed significant correlation with reading and writing. → Mendes 2017
Evidence¶
Mendes 2017¶
Mendes, G. G., & Barrera, S. D. (2017). Phonological Processing and Reading and Writing Skills in Literacy. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 27(68), 298-305. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272768201707
q2 · i? · associational · r1
In the correlational analysis of the 50-student third-grade sample, the article reports that "only the letters naming showed significant correlation with reading and writing"; no correlation coefficient is printed in the available text.
"In respect of rapid naming, only the letters naming showed significant correlation with reading and writing"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- For first-grade nonresponders, PALS showed no statistically significant effects on seven alphabetics outcomes compared with adult tutoring — related
- Kindergarten DIBELS subtests predict first-grade instructional reading, with Letter Naming Fluency the strongest predictor — related
- Phonological awareness and phonological memory are the skills that contributed most to initial reading and writing performance in third-grade students — related
- Visual processing showed no correlation with reading or writing in third-grade students — related
- Semantic ability correlates with phonological awareness, rapid naming, and both decoding measures in children with dyslexia — related
- Kindergarten DIBELS subtests significantly predict first-grade TerraNova vocabulary, language, and reading outcomes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
letters-rapid-naming-significant-correlation-reading-writing |
title |
Only letter naming among rapid-naming measures showed significant correlation with reading and writing |
description |
Only letter naming among rapid-naming measures showed significant correlation with reading and writing |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mendes-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.