Students had little meaningful choice about participation in the student success information system, as they could not remove themselves from the system as a whole¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? While students could opt out of text messages, their data was included in the system and they had to use it to engage with some campus departments. → Mary Francis 2023

Evidence¶

Mary Francis 2023¶

Mary Francis, Mejai Bola Mike Avoseh, Karen Card, Lisa Newland and Kevin Streff. (2023). Student Privacy and Learning Analytics: Investigating the Application of Privacy Within a Student Success Information System in Higher Education. Journal of Learning Analytics 10(3). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7975

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Case study finding from the results and discussion section: the article states "Choice and options were not addressed meaningfully by the IHE," and that students had to utilize the system to engage with departments such as advising, housing, and financial aid.

"While students could opt out of receiving text messages and limit how much they used the system personally, they could not remove themselves from the system as a whole."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In one MMLA nursing simulation study, 11 of 14 interviewed students preferred opt-out over opt-in consent, but most did not fully read the explanatory statement — related
• Changing the audio default from opt-in to opt-out raised audio availability from 72% to 99% of assignments and student audio use from 68% to 84% — related
• OpenStax Kinetic shifted from gift cards to shareable digital badges to incentivize adult learners to participate in research studies — related