Claims

Linked learning communities show no overall enrollment effect, but statistically significant gender-by-condition interactions on registration at Houston and substantively important differences at Hillsborough

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · causal r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 3 of 3 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across the six studies, none showed a statistically significant overall effect on postsecondary enrollment. → What Works Clearinghouse 2014 q3 i? At Houston, a statistically significant gender-by-condition interaction emerged: women in the intervention registered at a higher rate (88% versus 80%) while men registered at a lower rate (78% versus 84%). → What Works Clearinghouse 2014 (2) q3 i? At Hillsborough, men registered at a lower rate in the intervention group (78%) than in the comparison group (83%), a non-significant but substantively important difference. → What Works Clearinghouse 2014 (3)

Evidence

What Works Clearinghouse 2014

What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Linked Learning Communities. WWC Intervention Report. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/630

q3 · i? · review · r3

WWC synthesis of six RCTs (about 7,400 students) on registration and enrollment. Site-level registration comparisons were small and non-significant, e.g., Sommo et al. enrolled 87% versus 85% and Baltimore 85% versus 84%.

"Thus, for the postsecondary enrollment domain, none of the six studies that met WWC group design standards showed either a statistically significant effect or an effect large enough to be considered substantively important."

What Works Clearinghouse 2014 (2)

What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Linked Learning Communities. WWC Intervention Report. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/630

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Houston Community College RCT (Weissman et al., 2011; 1,273 students) using transcript registration data. The gender-by-condition interaction was statistically significant and "large enough to be considered substantively important" in the WWC's words.

"These authors did observe a statistically significant interaction between student gender and learning communities on registration rates. Women in the intervention condition registered at a higher rate (88%) than women in the comparison condition (80%), while men in the intervention condition registered at a lower rate (78%) than men in the comparison condition (84%)."

What Works Clearinghouse 2014 (3)

What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Linked Learning Communities. WWC Intervention Report. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/630

q3 · i? · causal · r3

Hillsborough RCT (Weiss et al., 2010; 1,071 students). The report states this "difference in registration rates between men and women in the intervention group is not statistically significant, but is large enough to be considered substantively important."

"Women registered for courses at about the same rate irrespective of their condition (85% versus 84%), but men registered for courses at a lower rate in the intervention group (78%) than in the comparison group (83%)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id linked-learning-communities-enrollment-gender-interactions
title Linked learning communities show no overall enrollment effect, but statistically significant gender-by-condition interactions on registration at Houston and substantively important differences at Hillsborough
description Linked learning communities show no overall enrollment effect, but statistically significant gender-by-condition interactions on registration at Houston and substantively important differences at Hillsborough
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2014
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — what-works-clearinghouse-2014, what-works-clearinghouse-2014-2, what-works-clearinghouse-2014-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.