Claims

The study did not establish whether journal writing enhanced listening more than reading, due to insufficient data

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The question of whether listening was enhanced by journal writing more than reading, or vice versa, was left unresolved because of insufficient data. → Saad and Ahmed 2015

Evidence

Saad and Ahmed 2015

Saad, I., & Ahmed, M. (2015). The Significance of Journal Writing in Improving Listening and Reading Comprehension in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA). Universal Journal of Educational Research 3(11): 815-821. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.031106

q2 · i? · causal · r1

The authors' own conclusion states the listening-versus-reading comparison was not established "due to insufficient data." This is a stated non-finding, not a tested null; equivalence was not tested.

"The study did not establish whether the listening skill was enhanced by journal writing more than reading or vice versa due to insufficient data."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.