A literature review investigated whether assessment metadata can provide information on SEL constructs¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The authors conducted a literature review to investigate whether assessment metadata can provide information on SEL constructs. → James Soland 2019
Evidence¶
James Soland 2019¶
James Soland, Gema Zamarro, Albert Cheng, Collin Hitt. (2019). Identifying naturally occurring direct assessments of social-emotional competencies: The promise and limitations of survey and assessment disengagement metadata. Educational Researcher 48 (7). https://journals.sagepub.com/home/edr doi:10.3102/0013189x19861356
q2 · i? · review · r?
The abstract states the study's method: "we conducted a literature review to investigate whether assessment metadata" can provide information on SEL constructs. The available text prints no details of the reviewed corpus, search strategy, or synthesis results.
"In this study we conducted a literature review to investigate whether assessment metadata (typically data relevant to how students behave on a test or survey) can provide information on SEL constructs"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Response times have been used extensively for achievement estimation but little work links test metadata to social-emotional constructs — related
- Using item response time metadata to measure students' social-emotional learning shows both promise and limitations — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Moderation analyses in reviewed SEL evaluations often lacked conceptual or empirical justification from prior literature or hypotheses — related
- Time students spend on math test questions is studied as a potential source of information about motivation and self-efficacy — related
- Mean item response durations show no strong relationship with math motivation and self-efficacy in general — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
literature-review-assessment-metadata-sel |
title |
A literature review investigated whether assessment metadata can provide information on SEL constructs |
description |
A literature review investigated whether assessment metadata can provide information on SEL constructs |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
recheck_by |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — james-soland-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.