Claims

The improvement index for Little Books on general reading achievement is +12 percentile points for each delivery variation, averaging +12 percentile points across the study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across the three variations of Little Books, the WWC-computed improvement index for general reading achievement was +12 percentile points for each group, averaging +12 for the study. → WWC Intervention Report: Little Books 2007

Evidence

WWC Intervention Report: Little Books 2007

WWC Intervention Report: Little Books. (2007). What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc

q3 · i? · causal · r?

WWC computation from the single study meeting standards (Phillips et al., 1990 randomized controlled trial of 314 analyzed kindergartners). The improvement index represents the percentile-rank difference between the average intervention student and the average comparison student; the report states it was "+12 percentile points for each group".

"The improvement index across the three variations of Little Books for general reading achievement was +12 percentile points for each group, resulting in an average of +12 percentile points for the study."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id little-books-improvement-index-plus-12-percentile
title The improvement index for Little Books on general reading achievement is +12 percentile points for each delivery variation, averaging +12 percentile points across the study
description The improvement index for Little Books on general reading achievement is +12 percentile points for each delivery variation, averaging +12 percentile points across the study
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2007
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — wwc-intervention-report-little-books-2007

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.