Dominant logical fallacies in LLM mathematical explanations shift from family to family and across prompting modes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Fallacy detection rates in LLM mathematical explanations vary by model family and prompting mode, with circular reasoning, fallacy of logic, and fallacy of relevance dominating in different models. → Esposito 2026
Evidence¶
Esposito 2026¶
Esposito, N., Tricarico, A., Porzio, L., Aghazadeh Ardebili, A., & Stella, M. (2026). Math Education Digital Shadows for Investigating Learning with GenAI: Mathematics Performance, Anxiety, and Confidence in LLMs. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27618 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.27618
q2 · i? · design · r2
Fallacy classification of Task 1 explanations (Q4–Q6) using a DistilBERT fallacy classifier thresholded at the 85th percentile per category. The article reports that "Granite 4 Tiny, Ministral 14B, and Anita 24B show a marked reliance on circular reasoning in AI-assistant mode," while DeepSeek Chat shows appeal to emotion as dominant in both conditions.
"Looking instead at the actual detection rates shown in Fig. 2a, the dominant fallacy shifts from family to family. Granite 4 Tiny, Ministral 14B, and Anita 24B show a marked reliance on circular reasoning in AI-assistant mode."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Family-level permutation tests do not detect reliable reasoning-versus-non-reasoning differences in accuracy, refusal, or consistency — related
- Zero-shot LLM errors follow four recurring patterns: over-interpretation, failure to detect relevant information, hallucination, and failure to generate a response — related
- Despite generally accurate feedback, the LLM's scoring explanations could be unpredictable and prone to logical inconsistency, failing to award points even when citing the correct rubric directive — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
llm-math-explanation-fallacies-vary-by-family |
title |
Dominant logical fallacies in LLM mathematical explanations shift from family to family and across prompting modes |
description |
Dominant logical fallacies in LLM mathematical explanations shift from family to family and across prompting modes |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — esposito-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.