Claims

Structured clinical performance shows the largest pooled signal (SMD 3.39) but rests on a very small evidence base

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Structured clinical performance showed the clearest pooled positive signal (2 studies; 38 vs. 39 participants; SMD 3.39, 95% CI 1.43 to 5.35), though the review cautions the estimate may be inflated. → Liu Xiaoliu 2026

Evidence

Liu Xiaoliu 2026

Liu Xiaoliu, Pan Jiayue, Zhang Chengyi, Wang Xiaomei, Wan Jinghua, Wang Qiang. (2026). Effectiveness of large language model-based teaching interventions in medical education: a systematic review and stratified meta-analysis of 14 studies. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09879-0

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Supplementary random-effects meta-analysis of structured or examination-based clinical performance outcomes from 2 studies (38 vs. 39 participants). The printed effect size is SMD 3.39 (95% CI 1.43 to 5.35). The review warns this is "a small-study signal from only 77 participants"; selective reporting and measurement artifact cannot be excluded; certainty was low.

"Structured clinical performance included 2 studies (38 vs. 39 participants), with a pooled effect of SMD 3.39 (95% CI 1.43 to 5.35) (Fig. 6)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.