LLM version progression explains about half of the variance in biomedical MCQ accuracy, with GPT‐4o_o1 over six times as likely as GPT‐3/3.5 to answer correctly¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q4
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i? Meta‐regression of OpenAI versions found version progression explained 54.9% of observed variance in accuracy (p < 0.001), with GPT‐4 OR = 3.13 and GPT‐4o_o1 OR = 6.36 versus GPT‐3/3.5. → Cheverko CM 2026
Evidence¶
Cheverko CM 2026¶
Cheverko CM, Mavrych V, Bolgova O, Mohamed FRR, Westrick J, Juarez L, Rush E, Solka KA, Doubleday AF, Byram JN, Becker R, Gomez V, Ganeng BKA, Hoffman LA, Roach VA, Brown KM, DeVaul N, Garnett CN, Herriott HL, Lufler RS, Mussell JC, Balta JY, Pascoe MA, Middleton JW, Duffy S, Stephens GC, Wilson AB. (2026). The performance of ChatGPT and other large language models on multiple‐choice questions in biomedical disciplines: A meta‐analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70262
q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Meta‐regression (maximum‐likelihood, random effects) on the pooled all‐discipline OpenAI dataset. Version progression "explained 54.9% of the observed variance in performance (p < 0.001)"; the article also reports β = 1.14 (OR = 3.13) for GPT‐4 and β = 1.85 (OR = 6.36) for GPT‐4o_o1 versus GPT‐3/3.5. Odds ratios are not standardised effect sizes, so i is null.
"A meta‐regression analysis of OpenAI's GPT versions indicated that version progression explained 54.9% of the observed variance in performance (p < 0.001)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- GPT‐4 through o1 models achieve pooled accuracy of 87% in the anatomical sciences and ≥83% in five of six biomedical disciplines, consistently above older versions — related
- Newer Anthropic and DeepSeek models approach GPT‐4o–o1 accuracy on biomedical MCQs, while Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot trail the leading companies — related
- Newer OpenAI LLM versions achieve significantly higher pooled accuracy on biomedical MCQs than earlier versions (GPT‐4o–o1: 90%; GPT‐4: 82%; GPT‐3/3.5: 59%) — related
- Question type, stem type, MCQ source, and web accessibility did not independently explain LLM accuracy heterogeneity in biomedical MCQ meta‐regressions — related
- GPT-4 achieves passing accuracy on USMLE Steps 1–3 (mean 86%), significantly exceeding GPT-3.5 (mean 56%) — related
- Newer LLM versions generally outperformed older versions on dental examination questions — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.