Claims

Case-study states rely on locally developed performance assessments created and piloted by teachers, with collaborative scoring

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Every case-study state relies on locally developed performance assessments developed and piloted by teachers, and almost all states described scoring as a collaborative process in which teachers develop, calibrate, and pilot rubrics together. → Jenna Howard Terrell 2023

Evidence

Jenna Howard Terrell 2023

Jenna Howard Terrell, Sarah Barzee. (2023). Graduation Requirements and Measures: A Review of Performance Assessment Implementation in Select States for the New York State Education Department. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED633310

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Cross-case finding from state interviews: "every state relies on locally-developed performance assessments that are developed and piloted by teachers." Interviewees stressed local context, and states like Oregon and Virginia provide resources such as student samples.

"Each state has its own procedures for developing and scoring performance assessments, though every state relies on locally-developed performance assessments that are developed and piloted by teachers."

Jenna Howard Terrell 2023 (2)

Jenna Howard Terrell, Sarah Barzee. (2023). Graduation Requirements and Measures: A Review of Performance Assessment Implementation in Select States for the New York State Education Department. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED633310

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Interview finding on scoring practice: teachers "develop and calibrate the scoring rubrics together and then pilot the rubrics" before sharing them, per the report's cross-case synthesis.

"Almost all case study states mentioned that they approached scoring as a collaborative process, where teachers develop and calibrate the scoring rubrics together and then pilot the rubrics before making them available to others."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id locally-developed-performance-assessments-teacher-collaborative-scoring
title Case-study states rely on locally developed performance assessments created and piloted by teachers, with collaborative scoring
description Case-study states rely on locally developed performance assessments created and piloted by teachers, with collaborative scoring
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — jenna-howard-terrell-2023, jenna-howard-terrell-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.