Claims

Loss of a study routine reduced productivity and fed a cycle of procrastination, workload pile-up, stress and escapism for many students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Not having a routine was reported by many students (59%, 560) to make them less productive, and some described procrastination leading to stress, anxiety and escapism in a self-perpetuating cycle. → Dilani Gedera · Dianne Forbes · Cheryl Brown · Maggie Hartnett · Ashwini Datt 2023

Evidence

Dilani Gedera · Dianne Forbes · Cheryl Brown · Maggie Hartnett · Ashwini Datt 2023

Dilani Gedera · Dianne Forbes · Cheryl Brown · Maggie Hartnett · Ashwini Datt. (2023). Learning during a pandemic: an Activity Theory analysis of the challenges experienced by Aotearoa/New Zealand university students. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10284-3

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Findings section drawing on the questionnaire and open-ended responses. The article quotes one participant describing "a self-perpetuating cycle" in which falling behind increased stress and led to escapism in distraction.

"Not having a routine made many (59%, 560) students less productive. They ended up “doing less work overall”"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.