Both low-ability training and low-ability control children improved significantly in early numeracy from pre-test to post-test¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 The low-ability training group improved significantly from pre- to post-test (V = 0, p = .002, printed effect size |r| = .85). → Meloni et al. 2017
q2 i3 The low-ability control group also improved significantly from pre- to post-test (V = 1, p = .005, printed effect size |r| = .76). → Meloni et al. 2017 (2)
Evidence¶
Meloni et al. 2017¶
Carla Meloni, Rachele Fanari, Andrea Bertucci and Sara Berretti. (2017). IMPACT OF EARLY NUMERACY TRAINING ON KINDERGARTENERS FROM MIDDLE-INCOME FAMILIES. 14th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2017). https://isbnsearch.org/isbn/978-989-8533-68-5
q2 · i3 · causal · r1
Wilcoxon paired test on the low-ability training group (n=14, combining cooperative and individual training participants) in the 25-child subsample. The article reports significant differences with printed effect size |r| = .85 ("V = 0, p = .002, |r| = .85").
"A first Wilcoxon test for paired sample was used to compare the performance in early numeracy competence (BIN 4-6 z-score) in pre- and post-test in the training group and results showed significant differences (V = 0, p = .002, |r| = .85)."
Meloni et al. 2017 (2)¶
Carla Meloni, Rachele Fanari, Andrea Bertucci and Sara Berretti. (2017). IMPACT OF EARLY NUMERACY TRAINING ON KINDERGARTENERS FROM MIDDLE-INCOME FAMILIES. 14th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2017). https://isbnsearch.org/isbn/978-989-8533-68-5
q2 · i3 · causal · r1
Wilcoxon paired test on the low-ability control group (n=11) in the 25-child subsample, who received only standard schooling plus drawing activities. The article reports a significant difference with printed effect size |r| = .76 ("V = 1, p = .005, |r| = .76").
"A second Wilcoxon test for paired sample was used to compare the performance in early numeracy competence (BIN 4-6 z-score) in the pre- and post-test in the control group, and results showed a significant difference (V = 1, p = .005, |r| = .76)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Number Sense — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- All three groups (cooperative learning, individual learning, and control) improved significantly in early numeracy from pre-test to post-test over 12 weeks — a broader claim this one bears on
- Among low-early-math-ability kindergarteners, supplemental training produced significantly higher improvement than an equally low-ability control group — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.