Claims

Before expanded options, only 13% of CPS freshmen who failed spring Algebra I recovered the credit over the summer

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In 2009-10, only 13% of CPS freshmen who failed their spring semester of Algebra I recovered the course credit over the summer. → Rickles 2016

Evidence

Rickles 2016

Rickles, J., Heppen, J., Taylor, S., Allensworth, E., Michelman, V., Sorensen, N., Walters, K., & Clements, P. (2016). Getting Back on Track: Who Needs to Recover Algebra Credit After Ninth Grade? (Research Brief 3). American Institutes for Research & University of Chicago Consortium on School Research. https://www.air.org/CreditRecovery

q2 · i? · associational · r1

District-level descriptive statistic from CPS administrative records for the year before the Back on Track Study started, cited to motivate whether online credit recovery could promote recovery more than traditional face-to-face summer classes.

"However, the rate of recovery the summer after failing the course is typically low. For example, during the year before the study started (2009–10), only 13% of CPS freshmen who failed their spring semester of Algebra I recovered the course credit over the summer."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id low-summer-algebra-credit-recovery-rate-before-study
title Before expanded options, only 13% of CPS freshmen who failed spring Algebra I recovered the credit over the summer
description Before expanded options, only 13% of CPS freshmen who failed spring Algebra I recovered the credit over the summer
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
recheck_by 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — rickles-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.