Claims

Lower-performing students with a learning disability showed larger model-estimated reading comprehension change scores than average-performing LD students, with cause undetermined

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? When change equations were recalculated at one standard deviation below the LD group's reading comprehension mean, lower-performing LD students showed larger estimated change scores than average-performing LD students. → Quinn 2020

Evidence

Quinn 2020

Quinn, Jamie M.; Wagner, Richard K.; Petscher, Yaacov; Roberts, Greg; Menzel, Andrew J.; Schatschneider, Christopher. (2020). Differential Co-Development of Vocabulary Knowledge and Reading Comprehension for Students with and without Learning Disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000382

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Secondary analysis recomputing the LD change-score equations at reading comprehension one standard deviation below the group mean (change scores of 1.41, 1.01, 0.70 across the three intervals, versus 1.11, 0.70, 0.38 at the average starting point). Descriptive model-estimated values with no significance test.

"Children with an LD who start with worse reading comprehension grow more than students with an LD who start with average reading comprehension."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.