Persistence of multiple-choice errors is driven by faulty reasoning that integrates the error into knowledge rather than by mere familiarity of lures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Errors that persisted were those endorsed on the initial test; students rarely selected the correct answer first and then produced a lure. → Marsh 2007
q3 i? Guessed errors rarely persisted (15%), while errors from faulty reasoning persisted more often (36% from reasoning with supporting knowledge; 67% from personal experience). → Marsh 2007 (2)
Evidence¶
Marsh 2007¶
Marsh, E. J., Roediger, H. L., III, Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2007). The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 194-199. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194051
q2 · i? · review · r2
Analysis of the relationship between students' answers on the two tests (Butler, Marsh, Goode, & Roediger, 2006; Roediger & Marsh, 2005) showed persistence was limited to previously endorsed lures, which argues against an illusory-truth familiarity account; no effect size is printed.
"Rarely did students select the correct answer on the initial test and then produce a lure on the final test. Nor were students likely to select Lure A on the first test and then produce Lure B on the final test."
Marsh 2007 (2)¶
Marsh, E. J., Roediger, H. L., III, Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2007). The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 194-199. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194051
q2 · i? · review · r2
In a study (Huelser & Marsh, 2006) where half the subjects explained their answer choices, a coding scheme classified explanations into eight categories; persistence was 15% for guessed errors, 36% for errors reasoned from supporting information, and 67% for errors from personal experience; these are descriptive percentages, not standardized effect sizes.
"Guesses were unlikely to persist to the final test (15% were reproduced as answers on the final general knowledge test), whereas errors resulting from faulty reasoning were much more likely to persist."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Taking initial multiple-choice tests without feedback can lead students to later produce the incorrect lure answers they selected, even when an overall retrieval practice benefit occurs — related
- Providing feedback after initial multiple-choice tests cut lure intrusions on final short-answer tests roughly in half, with immediate and delayed feedback equally effective — related
- Incorrect information learned from a multiple-choice test is applied and reasoned with on conceptually related transfer questions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
lure-persistence-reasoning-not-familiarity |
title |
Persistence of multiple-choice errors is driven by faulty reasoning that integrates the error into knowledge rather than by mere familiarity of lures |
description |
Persistence of multiple-choice errors is driven by faulty reasoning that integrates the error into knowledge rather than by mere familiarity of lures |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — marsh-2007, marsh-2007-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.