Claims

Persistence of multiple-choice errors is driven by faulty reasoning that integrates the error into knowledge rather than by mere familiarity of lures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Errors that persisted were those endorsed on the initial test; students rarely selected the correct answer first and then produced a lure. → Marsh 2007 q3 i? Guessed errors rarely persisted (15%), while errors from faulty reasoning persisted more often (36% from reasoning with supporting knowledge; 67% from personal experience). → Marsh 2007 (2)

Evidence

Marsh 2007

Marsh, E. J., Roediger, H. L., III, Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2007). The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 194-199. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194051

q2 · i? · review · r2

Analysis of the relationship between students' answers on the two tests (Butler, Marsh, Goode, & Roediger, 2006; Roediger & Marsh, 2005) showed persistence was limited to previously endorsed lures, which argues against an illusory-truth familiarity account; no effect size is printed.

"Rarely did students select the correct answer on the initial test and then produce a lure on the final test. Nor were students likely to select Lure A on the first test and then produce Lure B on the final test."

Marsh 2007 (2)

Marsh, E. J., Roediger, H. L., III, Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2007). The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 194-199. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194051

q2 · i? · review · r2

In a study (Huelser & Marsh, 2006) where half the subjects explained their answer choices, a coding scheme classified explanations into eight categories; persistence was 15% for guessed errors, 36% for errors reasoned from supporting information, and 67% for errors from personal experience; these are descriptive percentages, not standardized effect sizes.

"Guesses were unlikely to persist to the final test (15% were reproduced as answers on the final general knowledge test), whereas errors resulting from faulty reasoning were much more likely to persist."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id lure-persistence-reasoning-not-familiarity
title Persistence of multiple-choice errors is driven by faulty reasoning that integrates the error into knowledge rather than by mere familiarity of lures
description Persistence of multiple-choice errors is driven by faulty reasoning that integrates the error into knowledge rather than by mere familiarity of lures
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2007
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — marsh-2007, marsh-2007-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.