The LWPA advantage on the End-of-Unit exam persists after removing oral comprehension scores¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? After subtracting oral comprehension scores from each student's total, the LWPA group still outperformed the Comparison group on literacy components (Tukey/Kramer Q-stat = 3.01, p = .038). → Tetiana Zubenko 2019
Evidence¶
Tetiana Zubenko 2019¶
Tetiana Zubenko, Allan Shwedel. (2019). Integrating mobile listening and physical activity to facilitate intentional and incidental vocabulary acquisition. Advanced Education, Special Issue 11. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.165717
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Post-hoc analysis of the End-of-Unit results controlling for oral comprehension by subtracting those scores from each student's total. The Tukey/Kramer HSD test showed the LWPA group "outperformed the Comparison group on literacy components" (Q-stat = 3.01, df = 49, p = .038).
"Results from the Tukey/Kramer HSD test indicate that the LWPA group outperformed the Comparison group on literacy components of the End-of-Unit Exam, Q-stat = 3.01, df = 49, p < .05"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Audio lessons training vocabulary from L1 to L2 yield better L1-to-L2 translation than traditional L2-to-L1 training — related
- Amount of listening time while active was not significantly related to End-of-Unit exam performance — related
- Treatment effect interacts with exam sub-section, with oral comprehension showing the largest LWPA advantage — related
- Listening to vocabulary lessons while physically active improves End-of-Unit exam performance over traditional intentional learning alone — a broader claim this one bears on
- The SVAS group outperformed the comparison group across oral comprehension and vocabulary rubrics, with the largest gaps in answering questions and translating from Ukrainian — a broader claim this one bears on
- The performance gap between erroneous and non-erroneous student images persists after images are digitally redrawn to remove noise — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
lwpa-advantage-persists-without-oral-comprehension |
title |
The LWPA advantage on the End-of-Unit exam persists after removing oral comprehension scores |
description |
The LWPA advantage on the End-of-Unit exam persists after removing oral comprehension scores |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tetiana-zubenko-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.