Claims

Main idea identification instruction showed a moderate effect size in students with high-functioning ASD, suggesting the strategy is feasible to teach but the approach could be improved

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Intervention students progressed more than controls on main idea identification, with a moderate effect size. → Roux et al. 2015

Evidence

Roux et al. 2015

Catherine Roux, Eric Dion, Anne Barrette. (2015). Enhancing Reading Comprehension Among Students With High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Pilot Study. Canadian Journal of Education 38:1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1057963

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive analysis of difference scores in the randomized pilot; the article reports a moderate effect size for main idea identification, with no numeric value printed.

"As can be seen in Table 2, there was a very strong effect size for knowledge of definitions and a moderate one for main idea identification."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.