Observing a male model enhances perceived competence more from pretest to posttest than observing a female model, for both male and female observers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 The Test Moment x Gender Model interaction on perceived competence was significant (gp 2 = .029), with larger gains under a male model irrespective of observer gender. → Vincent Hoogerheide 2016
Evidence¶
Vincent Hoogerheide 2016¶
Vincent Hoogerheide, Sofie M. M. Loyens, Tamara van Gog. (2016). Learning from video modeling examples: does gender matter? Instructional Science, 44, 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9360-y
q3 · i1 · causal · r2
Mixed ANOVA on perceived competence in the 2x2 experiment: significant Test Moment x Gender Model interaction with printed effect size "gp 2 = .029"; male-model gains (3.32 to 4.98) exceeded female-model gains (3.46 to 4.67) for both observer genders.
"The interaction between Test Moment and Gender Model was significant, F(1, 159) = 4.81, p = .030, gp 2 = .029. A closer look at the data showed that observing a male model enhanced perceived competence more from pretest ( M = 3.32, SE = 0.16) to posttest ( M = 4.98, SE = 0.14), than observing a female model enhanced perceived competence improvement from pretest ( M = 3.46, SE = 0.16) to posttest ( M = 4.67, SE = 0.14)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Novice secondary students show large pretest-to-posttest gains in learning and near transfer of probability calculation after studying a video modeling example, regardless of model or observer gender — related
- Learning from a male model is more enjoyable and leads to greater willingness to receive similar instruction for male students than for female students — related
- Model-observer gender combination affects mental effort invested during example study: male students invest less effort with a male model, female students more effort with a male model — related
- Male secondary students report higher self-efficacy than female students after learning from video modeling examples, without higher performance — related
- Model gender and observer gender do not affect learning outcomes or near transfer from video modeling examples — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
male-model-boosts-perceived-competence |
title |
Observing a male model enhances perceived competence more from pretest to posttest than observing a female model, for both male and female observers |
description |
Observing a male model enhances perceived competence more from pretest to posttest than observing a female model, for both male and female observers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — vincent-hoogerheide-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.