Claims

Male students scored higher than female students on the agricultural science achievement test under both teaching methods

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Male students taught with the demonstration method scored higher (x = 70.30) than female students (x = 62.44), and male students taught with the conventional lecture method also scored higher than female students. → Daluba 2013

Evidence

Daluba 2013

Daluba, Noah Ekeyi. (2013). Effect of Demonstration Method of Teaching on Students' Achievement in Agricultural Science. World Journal of Education, 3(6). doi:10.5430/wje.v3n6p1

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Table 2 reports post-test means by gender and method: males 70.30 (demonstration) and 64.37 (lecture); females 62.44 (demonstration) and 58.17 (lecture). The authors note this gender difference in the discussion.

"Male students taught with the demonstration method scored higher (x = 70.30) than female students (x = 62.44) (Table 2)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.