Manipulation check: instructional condition significantly affected errors made during training, with exploratory learning producing more errors¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The nature of instruction had a significant effect on the number of errors trainees made during training, F(1, 345) = 101.51, p < .01, with exploratory learning leading to more errors. → Bell 2008

Evidence¶

Bell 2008¶

Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 296-316. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/articles/410/

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Manipulation-check analysis reported at the end of training: the instructional manipulation was validated both by self-report (81.4% of proceduralized-condition participants agreed they followed the step-by-step instructions) and by the error-rate test quoted. The supplied text is truncated mid-sentence on the direction statement.

"analyses revealed that the nature of instruction had a significant effect on the number of errors trainees made during training F(1, 345) = 101.51, p < .01. As would be expected, exploratory learning led to more e"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Emotion dynamics during problem-solving predict learning outcomes in a manner that depends on scaffolding design — related
• Acute stress impaired cognitive flexibility in men (more perseverative errors than male controls) — related