Traditional learning outperformed e-learning in studies where mannequin-based simulation was the traditional modality¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? When traditional learning methods outperformed e-learning, mannequin-based simulation, with or without accompanying coursework, was the modality most likely to be involved. → Blackwood Lachlan 2025
Evidence¶
Blackwood Lachlan 2025¶
Blackwood Lachlan, Hollo Zachary, Amaratunge Lahiru. (2025). Electronic learning methods compared to traditional learning methods in anaesthesia education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07502-2
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
The review's synthesis of included studies found that when traditional learning methods outperformed e-learning, mannequin-based simulation, with or without accompanying coursework, was the modality most likely to be involved.
"When traditional learning methods outperformed e-learning in some studies, we found mannequin-based simulation, with or without accompanying coursework, to be the modality most likely to be involved."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- E-learning is an important adjunct to traditional learning methods in anaesthesia education — related
- Online simulation training costs as little as 29% of mannequin-based simulation training with no quantitative difference in learning — related
- Virtual patients show larger advantages over passive traditional learning (lectures, reading) than over active learning — related
- The review reports that high-fidelity simulation outperformed case-based discussion for clinical reasoning and leadership in paediatric emergencies — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.