Claims

Traditional learning outperformed e-learning in studies where mannequin-based simulation was the traditional modality

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? When traditional learning methods outperformed e-learning, mannequin-based simulation, with or without accompanying coursework, was the modality most likely to be involved. → Blackwood Lachlan 2025

Evidence

Blackwood Lachlan 2025

Blackwood Lachlan, Hollo Zachary, Amaratunge Lahiru. (2025). Electronic learning methods compared to traditional learning methods in anaesthesia education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07502-2

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

The review's synthesis of included studies found that when traditional learning methods outperformed e-learning, mannequin-based simulation, with or without accompanying coursework, was the modality most likely to be involved.

"When traditional learning methods outperformed e-learning in some studies, we found mannequin-based simulation, with or without accompanying coursework, to be the modality most likely to be involved."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.