Manual content analysis of reflective writing is time-consuming, constraining pedagogical use and large-scale research¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The manual analysis of reflective writing is a time-consuming task whose cost constrains the frequency and intensity of its pedagogical use and limits large-scale research. → Thomas Daniel Ullmann 2019
Evidence¶
Thomas Daniel Ullmann 2019¶
Thomas Daniel Ullmann. (2019). Automated Analysis of Reflection in Writing: Validating Machine Learning Approaches. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (2019) 29:217–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00174-2
q2 · i? · design · r2
Motivational argument in the introduction, supported by cited content-analysis practice; the article states manual analysis "constrains the frequency and intensity of its pedagogical use" and limits large-scale research explorations and immediacy-of-feedback designs.
"The manual analysis of reflective writing is a time-consuming task, adding a cost that constrains the frequency and intensity of its pedagogical use."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Formative assessment practices coherent with OpenSciEd are constrained by grading expectations misaligned with formative goals and by the time cost of evaluating and giving feedback on three-dimensional tasks. — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
manual-reflection-analysis-costly-constrains-use |
title |
Manual content analysis of reflective writing is time-consuming, constraining pedagogical use and large-scale research |
description |
Manual content analysis of reflective writing is time-consuming, constraining pedagogical use and large-scale research |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — thomas-daniel-ullmann-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.