Linking studies connect MAP Growth scores to state summative proficiency predictions and external measures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Linking studies also connect MAP Growth scores to external measures including Lexile and Quantile metrics and ACT/SAT college readiness benchmarks. → Meyer 2022
Evidence¶
Meyer 2022¶
Meyer, J. P., & Dahlin, M. (2022). MAP Growth theory of action. NWEA. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/map-growth-theory-of-action/
q1 · i? · theoretical · r2
Descriptive statement about linking studies to external measures: Lexile and Quantile scores on reports, and ACT/SAT predictions driving the College Explorer tool. One study linked MAP Growth to a national composite of state summative scores to support use as a universal screener.
"NWEA college readiness benchmark information uses MAP Growth scores to predict future performance on the ACT® and SAT® (Thum, 2017; Thum & Matta, 2015). The link between MAP Growth and ACT/SAT scores drives the NWEA College Explorer tool"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Linking studies predict proficiency on state summative assessments from MAP Growth scores — related
- MAP Growth RIT scores correlate strongly (r = 0.92–0.93) with state summative mathematics scores in the Minnesota MCA-III linking study — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- MAP Growth spring RIT cut scores classify students as proficient or not proficient on the MCA-III Mathematics test with 0.87–0.90 overall accuracy — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- The dashboard reports median achievement percentiles normed to a nationally representative pre-COVID sample and projected proficiency against state cut scores — related
- Most high-achieving middle schoolers were on track for college readiness, but students in wealthy schools were more often on track than those in poor schools — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
map-growth-linking-studies-predictions |
title |
Linking studies connect MAP Growth scores to state summative proficiency predictions and external measures |
description |
Linking studies connect MAP Growth scores to state summative proficiency predictions and external measures |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
recheck_by |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — meyer-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.