Claims

Nearly a third of students never used the navigation map and overall task-test performance was mediocre

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1997 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A total of 7 students (32% of the sample) never visited the navigation map during the session. → Stanton 1997 q2 i? The mean task-test score was 57.7 out of 100, and the majority of students scored greater than or equal to 50. → Stanton 1997 (2)

Evidence

Stanton 1997

Stanton, N., Correia, A. P. and Dias, P. (1997). Efficacy of a map on search, orientation and access behaviour in a hypermedia system. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Efficacy+of+a+map+on+search+orientation+and+access+behaviour+in+a+hypermedia+system

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Descriptive result from the map-use analysis (frequency of visits and time looking at the map) in the 22-student study: "a total of 7 students (32% of the sample) never visited the navigation map".

"It is important to report that a total of 7 students (32% of the sample) never visited the navigation map."

Stanton 1997 (2)

Stanton, N., Correia, A. P. and Dias, P. (1997). Efficacy of a map on search, orientation and access behaviour in a hypermedia system. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Efficacy+of+a+map+on+search+orientation+and+access+behaviour+in+a+hypermedia+system

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Task-test outcomes in the same study: the mean score was 57.7 out of 100, and the article reports "the majority of the students had a score greater than or equal to 50". Students were described as sub-efficient and seemingly disorientated.

"Data obtained from the task-test outcomes showed a mean score of 57.7 (out of 100)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.