A marginal trend suggested teacher educators in the experimental condition tended to increase their use of digital knowledge tests after the intervention¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? For digital knowledge tests, a marginal trend (F(1,58)=3.50; p=0.06) indicated teacher educators in the experimental condition tended to increase use after the intervention compared to control. → Admiraal 2014
Evidence¶
Admiraal 2014¶
Admiraal, W., Janssen, T., Huizenga, J., Kranenburg, F., Taconis, R., & Corda, A. (2014). E-assessment of student-teachers’ competence as new teachers. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1043184
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Repeated measures analysis in the teacher-educator questionnaire data (60 educators with pre- and post-test). The article reports only a marginal, non-significant trend for digital knowledge test use; no effect size is printed.
"A marginal trend was found for the use of a digital knowledge test ( F(1,58)= 3.50; p= 0.06) indicating that teacher educators in the experimental condition tended to increase their use of a digital knowledge test after the intervention, compared to teacher educators from the control condition."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.