Claims

Empirical case of martial arts instruction grounds the argument that practice can support discovery

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The claim is elaborated through an empirical case of martial arts instruction based on interviews, video data, and training notes. → Trninic 2018

Evidence

Trninic 2018

Trninic, D. (2018). Instruction, repetition, discovery: restoring the historical educational role of practice. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9443-z

q1 · i? · qualitative · r?

Qualitative case evidence from martial arts instruction in New York City and the San Francisco Bay Area, including “semi-structured interviews, video data, and training notes”; other practitioners saw the author as an inquisitive community member rather than a scholar.

"Evidence used in this paper comes from data collected in New York City and the San Francisco Bay Area. They include semi-structured interviews, video data, and training notes."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id martial-arts-instruction-case-practice-discovery
title Empirical case of martial arts instruction grounds the argument that practice can support discovery
description Empirical case of martial arts instruction grounds the argument that practice can support discovery
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — trninic-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.