Claims

In an adaptive e-learning system, students whose actual learning mode matches their profile achieve higher test scores than mismatched students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students using the AES whose actual learning mode preferences match their stored profile score higher at repeat 0, repeat 1 and repeat 2 than students whose preferences do not match, significant at p = 0.05. → Surjono 2015

Evidence

Surjono 2015

Herman Dwi Surjono. (2015). The Effects of Multimedia and Learning Style on Student Achievement in Online Electronics Course. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1057334

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Multilevel analysis of repeated test scores within the AES experimental group (34 of 67 randomly assigned students), comparing actual printed-questionnaire preferences with the ls and mm values stored in each student's profile; the null hypothesis was rejected at p = 0.05. No effect size is printed.

"It can be concluded that students who study using the AES system in which their learning mode is suited have higher test score at repeat 0, repeat 1 and repeat 2 than students who study using the same system in which their learning mode is not suited."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.