Math ability fails to predict unique variance in either STEM participation or STEM achievement once math anxiety is controlled for¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In both regression models, Math Ability's unique effect was non-significant (% STEM Courses: p = .058; STEM Grades: p = .129). → Daker 2021
Evidence¶
Daker 2021¶
Daker, R.J., Gattas, S.U., Sokolowski, H.M., Green, A.E., & Lyons, I.M. (2021). First-year students' math anxiety predicts STEM avoidance and underperformance throughout university, independently of math ability. npj Science of Learning 6:17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00095-7
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Discussion summary of the two regression models in Table 1: Math Ability's unique coefficients were β = .129 (p = .058) for % STEM Courses and β = .086 (p = .129) for STEM Grades; the article states math ability "failed to predict unique variance in either" outcome. No standardized effect size is printed for these nulls.
"math ability actually failed to predict unique variance in either STEM participation or achievement when individual differences in math anxiety were accounted for"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- First-semester math anxiety uniquely predicts lower STEM grades over four years of university, controlling for math ability, STEM course-taking, and other covariates — related
- First-semester math anxiety uniquely predicts a reduction in the proportion of STEM courses students take over four years of university, controlling for math ability and other covariates — related
- Non-STEM grades moderate the negative math anxiety–STEM grades relation (stronger among high non-STEM achievers) but not the anxiety–STEM participation relation — related
- Math ability accounts for only ~12% of math anxiety–STEM associations, whereas math anxiety accounts for ~40% of math ability–STEM associations — related
- Maths anxiety did not independently predict STEM career choice once maths achievement was controlled, though it predicted in the unadjusted joint model — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.